Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Umkahlil now hosts Holocaust deniers. Will her blog go in the dustbin with other hate-mangers?

The problem I guess is that the day-to-day racism of Jews directed towards Palestinians has not much to do with religion at all, but is an expression of the social-darwinist aspects of Zionism. Zionism, as I understand it, is a pre-dominantly atheist racist ideology, basically the Jewish version of European fascism, in spite of the fact that it - like its predecessors - makes use of religion in order to pursue its ruthless goals.

Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
The Rebel Media Group
Andrew Winkler | Homepage | 03.15.06 - 2:37 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew, I think that is a slight oversimplification. As Georges Sorel pointed out a hundred years ago in 'Reflections on Violence', the atcual relationship between religious and state bodies is never stated by either of them, instead they both talk in terms of totalising ideologies, but at the same time they reach very pragmatic concordats, written or unwritten, which allow for an unprincipled but effective coordination between the lines. This is because, although their interests are mutually exclusive in theory, they are largely complimentary in practice. This is as true regarding Judiasm as it is regarding Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Shinto, or whatever.
Rowan Berkeley | 03.15.06 - 6:36 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Justice will be served when the zionist project is forced to pay the same reparations to Palestine that the Germans have been paying to the zionist project.
Kassandra | 03.15.06 - 10:23 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kassandra, now you are doing what Karin always does, which is assume that Nazi Germany did all sorts of horrible things that require endless restitutions, and that the best way of blackening the name of zionism is to say that it is just about as bad as Nazi Germany was.

And as I always respond, quite apart from the question of whether the official version of WW2 is correct or not, all this harping on the evils of Nazism indirectly gives the zionists, along with all other Jewish factions, the cue they need to respond that whatever they do is justified after "what happened to them."
Rowan Berkeley | 03.15.06 - 10:33 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kassandra, Rowan has got a point there. However I also like the idea of giving the Zionists a taste of their own medicine. I'm particularly fond of the idea of a war crimes tribunals a la Nuremberg... maybe without the squashed testicles, mock trials, threats of reprisals against family members and other forms of coerced confessions as it was standard operating procedure back then.

Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
The Rebel Media Group
Andrew Winkler | Homepage | 03.15.06 - 11:35 am | #

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

What's your problem with those posts, Iby?

Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
The Rebel Media Group

4:54 PM, March 16, 2006  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Funny how your nazi background doesn't allow you to understand the problems with those posts.

8:30 AM, March 17, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

they look perfectly fine to me... but tell me, what makes you think that I have a nazi background? The only nazis I know of that still exist are the zionists, and I'm not one of them.

6:25 PM, March 20, 2006  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

As you can see, it is your nazi background that is to blame for your poor insight.

1:06 PM, March 22, 2006  
Blogger Ibrahamav said...

Here is more of winkler's bullshit:

The Bush crime family and the Zionist mafia have already intensified their war propaganda, blaming Iran for the usual mix of WDM and support of terrorism.

But Iran's support of terrorism is well documented. Could 'shit-for-brains' Winkler be that stupid?

5:36 AM, March 27, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home